Информация об изменениях

Сообщение Re: Свинец + апатит = ВТСП от 27.07.2023 3:52

Изменено 27.07.2023 4:08 Эйнсток Файр

Re: Свинец + апатит = ВТСП
Скорее всего статья не пройдёт ревью:

a paper by a physicist who’d already had a paper on room-temperature superconductors retracted from the journal Nature in 2021. In the Nature case, a crucial analysis was found to be seriously flawed; in the newer case (which wasn’t specifically focused on superconductors), it appears that some data had been falsified or fabricated.

это по ссылке из английской википедии.

расходимся.
Re: Свинец + апатит = ВТСП
Скорее всего статья не пройдёт ревью:

a paper by a physicist who’d already had a paper on room-temperature superconductors retracted from the journal Nature in 2021. In the Nature case, a crucial analysis was found to be seriously flawed; in the newer case (which wasn’t specifically focused on superconductors), it appears that some data had been falsified or fabricated.

это по ссылке из английской википедии.

given the history, and given the very unconvincing data in these new studies, you shouldn’t bet on it

расходимся.