Здравствуйте, Vermicious Knid, Вы писали:

VK> Я не так давно смотрел данные опросов — пользователям GHC это все просто не нужно. То что им нужно, разработчикам GHC улучшать не особо и интересно — они же занимаются чистой наукой.
В потверждение моих слов — вот оно. Небольшой отрывок:

Second, here's a super-quick summary of what we've learned:

— The #1 complaint was the compilation speed and memory usage of GHC.

— Next most unpopular was performance and size of the generated code.

— The most-requested feature, after performance improvements, is some kind of debugger.

— Portability and the difficulty of compiling GHC was raised a lot.

— API and feature changes breaking code between releases was also a common gripe.

— Many people mentioned the quality of error messages as something that could be improved.

— Many people want improvements to documentation, especially library docs.

— Lots of requests for an IDE and better GUI support.

— There is some concern over the complexity of GHC affecting its maintainability and portability,
and how difficult it is to contribute.