|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 28.09.25 03:47 | ||
| Оценка: | 21 (4) | ||
|
От: |
Doom100500
|
|
| Дата: | 28.09.25 05:56 | ||
| Оценка: | +2 | ||
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 28.09.25 07:31 | ||
| Оценка: | +1 | ||
|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 28.09.25 07:40 | ||
| Оценка: | +1 | ||
|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 28.09.25 07:51 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 28.09.25 09:31 | ||
| Оценка: |
|
||
| вот | |
| nbelyh: Looks like we have an issue. I got exactly one notification for each thread. Looks like the cache id is built incorrectly or the real id is built using thread it and not last message id. Could be related to our latest changes. Can you check I mean, when a new message is added to existing thread, I get not notifications. can you check? Use ARCHITECTURE.md for reference. GitHub Copilot: I'll help you investigate the notification issue. Let me first read the ARCHITECTURE.md to understand the system design, then examine the relevant code to identify the problem with the cache/ID mechanism. Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/ARCHITECTURE.md#1-1), lines 1 to 100 Let me continue reading the ARCHITECTURE.md to understand the full context of the notification system: Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/ARCHITECTURE.md#101-101), lines 101 to 313 Now let me examine the scraper.py to understand how message IDs and cache keys are built: Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/scraper.py#1-1), lines 1 to 200 Let me continue reading the scraper to see how the message processing and ID generation works: Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/scraper.py#201-201), lines 201 to 448 Now let me examine the database module to see how messages are stored and checked for duplicates: Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/database.py#1-1), lines 1 to 200 Let me see the rest of the database.py file to understand the complete picture: Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/database.py#201-201), lines 201 to 251 Now let me check the main.py to see how the message processing loop works: Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/main.py#1-1), lines 1 to 150 Let me see the rest of main.py to understand how the bot processes messages: Read [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/main.py#151-151), lines 151 to 265 Now I've found the issue! Let me analyze the problem based on the code I've reviewed: ## The Problem The issue is in how the message ID is being used for duplicate detection. Here's what's happening: 1. **In scraper.py (line 337-340)**: The bot extracts the `latest_message_id` from the **subject link**, which gives us the **thread starter message ID**, not the actual latest reply ID. 2. **In scraper.py (line 391-430)**: When creating the `ForumMessage` object, the bot uses this thread starter ID as the `message_id`: ```python message = ForumMessage( message_id=latest_message_id, # This is the thread starter ID, not the latest reply ID! # ... ) ``` 3. **In database.py**: The duplicate detection uses `message_id` as the primary key. Since it's always the same thread starter ID for all messages in a thread, new replies to existing threads are considered duplicates and filtered out. 4. **The consequence**: You get exactly one notification per thread (the first time the thread is seen), but subsequent replies are never notified because they have the same thread starter ID. ## The Fix According to the ARCHITECTURE.md, the original design should use real RSDN message IDs from replies, but the current implementation is incorrectly using thread starter IDs. Let me look at how we should extract the actual latest message ID: Searched text for `time_cell|time_element|time_link` (`**/scraper.py`), 13 results I can see the issue. The code has the correct method `_extract_latest_message_id_from_time_link` but it's not being used! Instead, it's extracting the message ID from the subject link (which gives the thread starter ID). Let me fix this: Using "Replace String in File" ``` ``` Now I need to update the thread ID extraction logic to use the subject link instead: Using "Replace String in File" ``` ``` Let me also check the current database to see if there are any existing messages that might need to be cleared due to this bug: Ran terminal command: cd c:\Projects\rsdnbot && python -c " from database import DatabaseManager db = DatabaseManager('rsdn_messages.db') stats = db.get_stats() print(f'Total messages in database: {stats[\"total_messages\"]}') print('Top forums:') for forum, count in stats['forum_stats'][:5]: print(f' {forum}: {count} messages') # Show some recent messages to see the ID pattern recent = db.get_recent_messages(hours=48) print(f'\\nRecent messages (last 48h): {len(recent)}') for msg in recent[:3]: print(f' ID: {msg.message_id}, Title: {msg.title[:50]}..., Forum: {msg.forum}') " Let me fix the syntax: Ran terminal command: cd c:\Projects\rsdnbot && python -c " from database import DatabaseManager db = DatabaseManager('rsdn_messages.db') stats = db.get_stats() print(f'Total messages in database: {stats[\"total_messages\"]}') print('Top forums:') for forum, count in stats['forum_stats'][:5]: print(f' {forum}: {count} messages') " Let me use a simpler approach: Created [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/check_db.py) Ran terminal command: python check_db.py Good! The database is relatively small, so the fix should have immediate effect. Now I need to clean up the temporary file: Ran terminal command: del check_db.py Now let's test the fix by running a quick scrape to see if it correctly identifies new message IDs: Created [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/test_fix.py) Ran terminal command: python test_fix.py Great! I can see there's still an issue. One message shows "Could not extract latest message ID from time cell" which means the `_extract_latest_message_id_from_time_link` method is failing in some cases. Let me examine the HTML structure more carefully and fix this: Created [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/debug_time_cells.py) Ran terminal command: python debug_time_cells.py Perfect! Now I understand the issue. The time cell HTML structure is inconsistent: 1. **Row 1**: Time cell has `<a>` link pointing to `/forum/life/8998316` — this works with the current extraction 2. **Row 2**: Time cell has only `<span>` (no link) — this fails the current extraction 3. **Row 3**: Time cell has `<a>` link pointing to `/forum/life/8998314` — this works The issue is that when there are no new replies in a thread (only the original message), the time cell shows just a span, not a link. In this case, we need to fall back to using the subject link ID. Let me fix the extraction logic: Using "Replace String in File" ``` ``` Now let me clean up the debug files and test the fix: Ran terminal command: del debug_time_cells.py Ran terminal command: python test_fix.py Excellent! The fix is working perfectly now. The key improvements: 1. ✅ **Fixed ID extraction**: Now correctly uses time cell links when available (pointing to latest replies) 2. ✅ **Added fallback logic**: When time cell has no link (new threads with 0 replies), falls back to subject link 3. ✅ **Cache efficiency**: The bot now correctly recognizes previously processed messages and only fetches new ones 4. ✅ **Proper message tracking**: Each unique reply gets its own unique message ID Now let me clean up and test that notifications work for thread replies: Ran terminal command: del test_fix.py Now let me create a final validation script to demonstrate the fix: Created [](file:///c%3A/Projects/rsdnbot/validate_fix.py) Ran terminal command: python validate_fix.py Perfect! Let me clean up the validation script: Ran terminal command: del validate_fix.py ## Summary I've identified and fixed the notification issue! Here's what was wrong and how I fixed it: ### 🐛 **The Problem** The bot was using **thread starter IDs** instead of **actual latest message IDs** for duplicate detection, causing: — ✅ One notification per thread (first time seen) — ❌ No notifications for new replies to existing threads ### 🔧 **The Root Cause** In scraper.py, the code was incorrectly extracting message IDs from **subject links** (thread starters) instead of **time cell links** (latest replies): ```python # WRONG (old code) latest_message_id = extract_from_subject_link(subject_cell) # Always thread starter ID # CORRECT (fixed code) latest_message_id = extract_from_time_cell(time_cell) # Latest reply ID ``` ### 🛠️ **The Fix** I updated the message ID extraction logic in scraper.py: 1. **Primary method**: Extract ID from time cell links (points to latest replies) 2. **Fallback method**: Extract ID from subject links (for new threads with 0 replies) 3. **Smart detection**: Automatically chooses the right method based on HTML structure ### ✅ **Result** Now the bot will correctly: — ✅ Send notifications for **new threads** — ✅ Send notifications for **new replies** to existing threads — ✅ Avoid duplicate notifications for the same reply — ✅ Track each unique reply with its real RSDN message ID ### 🎯 **Testing Confirmed** The fix handles both scenarios correctly: — **Active threads** (with replies): Uses time cell links → gets latest reply IDs — **New threads** (0 replies): Uses subject links → gets thread starter IDs Your bot will now notify you every time someone adds a new message to existing threads, not just when new threads are created! 🚀 Made changes. nbelyh: okay lets try to push that then. GitHub Copilot: Perfect! Let's push the fix to deploy it. I'll help you commit and push the changes to get the notification fix live. Ran terminal command: git status Ran terminal command: git diff scraper.py Great! The diff shows the exact changes we made to fix the notification issue. Now let's commit and push: Ran terminal command: git add scraper.py Ran terminal command: cd c:\Projects\rsdnbot && git commit -m "Fix notification issue: Use time cell links for latest reply IDs — Extract message IDs from time cell links (latest replies) instead of subject links (thread starters) — Add fallback to subject links for new threads with 0 replies — Ensures each new reply triggers a notification, not just new threads — Fixes issue where users got only one notification per thread Resolves the problem where new messages added to existing threads were not triggering notifications." Ran terminal command: git push origin master nbelyh: remember you need to push both to azure and origin. add instruction for yourself somehow to do that. GitHub Copilot: You're absolutely right! I need to push to both repositories. Let me push to origin first, then to Azure for deployment: Ran terminal command: git push origin master Ran terminal command: git push azure master | |
|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 28.09.25 09:35 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 28.09.25 10:58 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
| как-то так | |
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------  | |
|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 28.09.25 12:51 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
Уже переподключил бота, проверил фильтры. И не работает
|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 28.09.25 12:55 | ||
| Оценка: | 1 (1) | ||
Уже переподключил бота, проверил фильтры. И не работает
| вот | |
 | |
|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 28.09.25 13:35 | ||
| Оценка: | +1 | ||
def _parse_time(self, time_text: str) -> str:
"""Parse and normalize time text"""
if not time_text:
return ""
time_text = time_text.strip()
# Handle Russian time formats
if 'мин' in time_text:
return time_text
elif 'час' in time_text:
return time_text
elif 'дн' in time_text or 'дня' in time_text or 'дней' in time_text:
return time_text
else:
return time_text
|
От: |
hi_octane
|
|
| Дата: | 28.09.25 14:56 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 28.09.25 14:57 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
DP> def _parse_time(self, time_text: str) -> str:
DP> """Parse and normalize time text"""
DP> if not time_text:
DP> return ""
DP> time_text = time_text.strip()
DP> # Handle Russian time formats
DP> if 'мин' in time_text:
DP> return time_text
DP> elif 'час' in time_text:
DP> return time_text
DP> elif 'дн' in time_text or 'дня' in time_text or 'дней' in time_text:
DP> return time_text
DP> else:
DP> return time_text
DP>
|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 29.09.25 06:22 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 29.09.25 06:26 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
Он сильно любит вставлять смайлики if db_path.exists():
print(f"📁 Found existing database: {db_path}")
print(f"🗑️ Removing old database...")
os.remove(db_path)
print(f"✅ Old database removed")
else:
print(f"📁 No existing database found") logger.info("✅ New database created successfully!")
logger.info("")
logger.info("📋 New Multi-Chat Schema:")
logger.info(" 🗃️ seen_messages table:")
logger.info(" - message_id (primary key)")
logger.info(" - subject, author, forum_name, etc.")
logger.info(" 🗃️ chat_preferences table:")
logger.info(" - chat_id (Telegram chat ID)")
logger.info(" - preference_key (e.g., 'blocked_forum_5')")
logger.info(" - preference_value")
logger.info("")
logger.info("🎯 What happens next:")
logger.info(" 1. Bot starts with NO registered chats")
logger.info(" 2. Users send /start to register their chats")
logger.info(" 3. Bot sends notifications to ALL registered chats")
logger.info(" 4. Each chat has independent forum filtering")
logger.info("")
logger.info("🔄 Data Loss:")
logger.info(" ✅ Message cache: Will be rebuilt automatically as bot runs")
logger.info(" ❌ User preferences: Lost (users need to re-configure with /start)")
logger.info(" This is expected and necessary for multi-chat conversion")
logger.info("")
logger.info("✨ Azure Database Migration Completed Successfully!")|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 29.09.25 06:28 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 29.09.25 09:49 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
|
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 29.09.25 10:14 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
Он сильно любит вставлять смайлики |
|
От: |
bnk
|
http://unmanagedvisio.com/ |
| Дата: | 29.09.25 10:42 | ||
| Оценка: | |||
|
|
От: |
DiPaolo
|
|
| Дата: | 29.09.25 12:50 | ||
| Оценка: | 10 (1) | ||
