Re[2]: winsock http response
От: MaxGl Украина  
Дата: 27.02.09 11:36
Оценка:
Здравствуйте, MaxGl, Вы писали:

MG>Здравствуйте, crawler, Вы писали:


C>>Добрый день,


C>>что не нравится браузеру ...

MG>А что браузер пишет?
Может тут проблема?
RFC2616

Transfer-Encoding MUST be used to indicate any transfer-codings applied by an application to ensure safe and proper transfer of the message. Transfer-Encoding is a property of the message, not of the

entity, and thus MAY be added or removed by any application along the request/response chain. (However, section 3.6 places restrictions on when certain transfer-codings may be used.)

The rules for when a message-body is allowed in a message differ for requests and responses.

The presence of a message-body in a request is signaled by the inclusion of a Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding header field in the request's message-headers. A message-body MUST NOT be included in a request if the specification of the request method (section 5.1.1) does not allow sending an entity-body in requests. A server SHOULD read and forward a message-body on any request; if the request method does not include defined semantics for an entity-body, then the message-body SHOULD be ignored when handling the request.

 
Подождите ...
Wait...
Пока на собственное сообщение не было ответов, его можно удалить.