Здравствуйте, VladiCh, Вы писали:

VC>Чувак же прочитал нифига неправильно, также как и ты.

Чувак всё прочитал правильно: рекомендованный Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel тест был отозван, дана рекомендация найти ему замену чем нить другим, что будет отличать простуду от ковида.

О том, что отозванный тест меряет погоду на Марсе уже давно говорили. Более того, чем дольше циклы PCR крутишь тем больше он покажет false positives.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives/

The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.

The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.

Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying: with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.

And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said: If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR.

This has all been public knowledge since the beginning of the lockdown. The Australian government’s own website admitted the tests were flawed, and a court in Portugal ruled they were not fit for purpose.
Even Dr Anthony Fauci has publicly admitted that a cycle threshold over 35 is going to be detecting “dead nucleotides”, not a living virus.
Despite all this, it is known that many labs around the world have been using PCR tests with CT values over 35, even into the low 40s.